Donald Trump — November 3, 2019 at 9:44 am

Let’s stop helping Trump lie


Our media has been trained to privilege lies, another weakness in our system Trump has hacked (but it’s helping him get impeached).

Democrats are being accused of something preposterous — good messaging.

It is obviously not true that Republicans are not trying to “weaponize” testimony and being crushed because of the their restraint. We know this because “the first remotely spinnable testimony for the GOP leaked immediately.” Instead, Republicans have no case to make and they know it.

But I wish it were true! Oh, how I love to see Democrats accused of good messaging.

It’s such a rarity that when a Democrat is guilty of it — as Elizabeth Warren is when she says repeatedly and without shame “middle class families will pay less” — it summons a national freakout that demands spreadsheets and the first hour of every debate.

Democratic messaging is generally too policy-based, too unemotional and too disparate to overwhelm any media and/or right-wing narrative.

Still, Speaker Pelosi has proven her power to move the polls, as support for impeachment has been at or near 50 percent since she came out for it. And she was savvy in the way she’s deliberately built a case in private using legal-like methods and then called Republicans bluff to go public once the evidence became overwhelming. But the messaging has been generally scattershot and Trump is still setting the central themes of the debate — is there a quid-pro-quo or no?

You don’t see Democrats adopting a general message — such as “Trump has abused his office and betrayed the Constitution and now the question is if Republicans will join that betrayal” — and making it the first answer to any question they’re asked on TV.

What we are seeing is Democrats benefiting from the press’ bias toward “facts.”

The great Dr. Rachel Bitecofer notes, “Ds aren’t winning the messaging war on impeachment- they’re winning on substance. That’s bc, like w Nixon, the facts BEG for impeachment. When the substance is weak- THEN the message become paramount.”

What does our bias toward “facts” look like? It has little to do with “truth” but is all about “balance” and “context,” even at the expense of truth.

It looks like the press repeating almost verbatim “Trump says he wants to end our endless wars” three years of an administration that has only seen an escalation of every conflict we are in, with more civilian casualties and the brink of a disastrous war in Iran that could be exponentially worse than the Iraq War.

And I wish it were just the mainstream press!

Here’s some examples from sources I love:

Even if people read more than one line, the first line still frames the message. Why are we spreading the idea that these plans are expensive when the vast majority of people who get coverage through the exchanges get it for free or almost free?

And there’s Trump’s continuing ability to frame our debates, like this one:

I love Steven Greenhouse, the dean of labor reporters. Get his fantastic book and listen to our interview with him!

But if we’re debating whether or not this is “the greatest economy ever,” Trump is winning. We’re not talking about the struggle, the fragility of this juiced stock market and the fact that there’s nothing to save us if there’s another crash because Trump has given it all to his billionaire donors and their corporations.

Framing matters, whether we like it or not.

Our advantage when it comes to impeachment is that the facts are so overwhelming that they comport with the conventional media understanding of “the facts.” But with a billion dollars to burn, a system that doesn’t know how to resist bullshit and the massive powers of the presidency to sway and steal elections, we can’t count on the facts.

I prefer if you never repeat Trump — like, never ever use his words or retweet him. Never. But if you must (and everyone slips), definitely don’t repeat him first before your message.