Guest Post: Men Who Stare at Votes — Insulting treatment of female constituents by Michigan Republicans

Depends on your definition of “represent”, I suppose…

This post is a cross-post of a terrific piece by Emily Magner from her blog Musings of a Lady. The original post can be found HERE.

Emily actually turned up in one of Anne’s photos from the rally on Tuesday:


Click image for original photo

In her piece, Magner talks about her treatment by two Republican legislators who “represent” her. She and a group of students did their civic duty by traveling to Lansing to meet with their State Senator and Representative to discuss House Bill 5711, a sweeping anti-abortion bill that will severely limit access to women’s reproductive health services, including abortions, across Michigan. The bill has a particularly acute impact on rural women — like the women in Magner’s area.

The treatment they encountered, while not surprising given the recent behavior of Michigan Republican lawmakers, is a story that needs to be heard. These two men are simply microcosms of the Republican-led legislature at this moment. Thanks to the impact of nearly criminal gerrymandering of our political boundaries in Michigan, we now have a legislature that does not reflect the state as a whole.

The way that Emily Magner and her students were treated, the dismissal of their concerns and opinions as not worth listening to or invalid, is a direct result of our legislative imbalance where the ideology of those in power and who supposedly represent us is so off-kilter and so far removed from the positions of most Michiganders.

My thanks go to Emily for allowing me to repost this essay and please do visit her blog Musings of a Lady.



Men Who Stare at Votes: The Men of Michigan’s Republican Legislature Can’t Look Their Female Constituents in the Eye

On November 28th a group of social work students and myself woke up at 3:30 am, drove on unplowed and unsalted roads to talk to our representatives about HB 5711.

We studied and analyzed this 60+ page bill and found that it would regulate women’s health centers out of existence, limit abortion access for women in rural areas, prevent private insurance companies from covering any abortion services, give a tax credit for fetuses (but not for children), and it would allow medical providers to deny any health care service they deem objectionable.

After careful analysis we believed this bill to be nothing but harmful to Michigan women, families, and communities.

Our first visit was with Senator Howard Walker. We started our meeting wholeheartedly thanking him for taking the time to meet with us. I talked about the importance of hearing both sides to an issue. I talked about ethical obligations — I believe social workers and politicians have something in common.

What a mental health professional says to a client has a different weight to it than if a friend or family member were to say something to them. The same goes for a politician. When a politician speaks, they speak for everyone in their district.

I told Howard that as social workers, in order to preserve the integrity of our profession we follow the National Association of Social Workers code of ethics. This code tells us in order to help our clients achieve self-determination we must leave our personal opinions at the door.

Howard Walker looked at us blankly. He glanced at his watch. He fussed with his phone.

We went on to talk specifically about how this bill will harm Michigan women, disproportionately women living in rural areas like ours. After we brought up a few of these points he put up his hands and said that he couldn’t really speak to those topics … he had not read the bill.

In front of him was a one paragraph synopsis I assume was from the Right to Life special interest organization who drafted the bill.

Howard Walker had not even bothered to read it.

We spoke with him for 20 minutes, the whole time he was dismissive, misinformed, and rude. When his handler told him, “5 more minutes,” I told him that I would never ask him to change his beliefs on abortion, I would protect his right to believe whatever he wanted, but I did want him to consider the harmful implications that this legislation would have on women and consider his ethical obligation to his field to leave his personal views at the door.

Before I could finish my sentence, he waved his hand dismissively and interrupted, “THIS ISN’T ABOUT WOMEN! THIS IS ABOUT PROTECTING FETUSES!”

We were all silent. Shocked.

I calmly put my palm down on the table, spoke gently, looked him straight in the eye and said, “Howard, you do know where babies come from don’t you?”

I went on. “Do not try to tell me that this isn’t about women, about families, about communities, and yes, about me, a woman. A woman you represent.”

We have elected lawmakers who do not care, who do not read bills, and who do not represent us. They admit this openly. Our representatives can’t even be bothered to be respectful when we travel from their home districts to offer an opposing view.

Our next stop was State Representative Wayne Schmidt’s office. After hounding his office with e-mails and phone messages for over 3 weeks, we were finally able to get an appointment to meet with him.

What a different experience we had there.

Our group had just left the office of a man who ideologically believed in this bill…it was quickly made apparent that Wayne Schmidt is merely a puppet.

Right off the bat, as we sat down, Wayne told us that he did not want to talk about HB 5711. He told us it wasn’t going to come up in lame duck. “It’s a bad bill. It is not going to be voted on.”

Wait -– a bad bill? He voted for it! We were stunned.

The man representing us gave his vote for HB 5711 and then openly admitted to our faces that he believed it to be a bad bill! He even went so far as to point out different aspects of the bill that he disagreed with- such as the one million dollars of insurance a doctor would be required to purchase in order to provide Emergency Contraception to a patient, yet Wayne voted yes!

I had to ask the question, “Why?”

He told us that it was “just politics.” He said that he needs the Right to Life endorsement, so he voted for it.

Again, we were shocked. Absolutely floored.

He admitted to five of his constituents’ faces that he supported a bill that he knew to be wrong because he needed a special interest’s endorsement.

This is criminal.

Before we left, I told Wayne Schmidt that if he was a good politician he wouldn’t need a special interest’s endorsement to win. I looked him square in the eye and told him that he will never get my vote (should he run for office again). He has not earned my vote and he does not deserve it.

Those of us who took the time to make appointments to go and visit face-to-face with our lawmakers feel a true loss.

We are not being represented by qualified people. They are men who vote with their religion, men who vote with their pocketbooks.

These are men who don’t read bills, who don’t listen to us, who don’t trust women, or care what we think.

I sign petitions, I write letters, I make phone calls, I write articles, I mobilized a group of my peers to join me in the three and a half hour drive to talk to our representatives in person, and all I have learned is that they do not care.

I have learned that that we, the people they represent, the people in their home district, don’t matter to them. Our voices are not heard.

By showing their true colors they gave me a gift–

I am now inspired like never before to encourage qualified women to run for office.

Our current representatives modeled for me the type of person I never want to be.

They showed me that someday, I will have what it takes to be a real leader for my community.



Emily Magner is one proud Michigan woman. Her passion is advocacy, she believes that we need to move from a society asleep at the political wheel to one that is actively engaged in holding our representatives accountable to the task of representing us. She is a proud supporter of Planned Parenthood and women’s rights.

Emily is the founder of the Social Work Advocacy Coalition of Michigan. This organization was created as a non-partisan group to educate people on bills and policies that effect Michigan citizens.

In addition to committing a large portion of her life to reading the news, Emily enjoys spending time with her loving husband and two beloved dogs, Coochie and Tippy.

Emily is a regular columnist for the White Pine Press.

, ,

eXTReMe Tracker