This President’s Greatest Accomplishment

It’s not keeping Palin out of the White House, but that’s close.

Can I share with you the most offensive thing I’ve read since I last accidentally read chyron on the Bill O’Reilly show?

David Greenberg writes in The New Republic:

Because Barack Obama has accomplished relatively little in his first term—boxed in by a recalcitrant Republican opposition, the sluggish economy, and a mound of debt—it’s tempting to hope that, should he win a second term, he’ll be free to pursue an unbridled liberal agenda.

Because Barack Obama has accomplished relatively little? Compared to who FDR? Lincoln? Johnson? Thomas Edison?

Even Bill Clinton will admit that this president has had more progressive achievements in his first term that Clinton put together in eight years of peace and prosperity.

Forget ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Forget Student Loan Reform, Credit Card Reform, creating Elizabeth Warren’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Forget expanding Medicare and Medicaid while ending pre-existing conditions. Forget saving the auto industry and putting four million Americans back to work despite a Republican party imposing austerity on the state and local levels. Even forget making the historic choice to go after bin Laden. All of those things are somewhat reversible, unfortunately.

What isn’t reversible is the President’s greatest accomplishment: Ending the Iraq War.

But he gets almost no credit for this. On the right, they say he was just following Bush’s timeline and we should still have troops there to prevent a civil war. On the left, they say he was just following Bush’s timeline and we still have thousands of contractors in a giant embassy.

Both sides forget history. As Barack Obama was winning the 2008 election on the issue of the Iraq War, he changed the debate and forced the timeline that Bush adopted.

From July 18, 2008:

In a stunning diplomatic breakthrough for Barack Obama, Iraq’s prime minister yesterday endorsed the Democratic candidate’s 16-month timeline for withdrawing combat troops from Iraq.

The timeline Bush adopted was never Bush’s timeline. It was Obama’s. (That’s why he won the Nobel Peace Prize, in case you’re wondering.) The privatization of the military as described in Rachel Maddow’s Drift made getting out a bit easier. But ending this war was a mission this man adopted as a State Senator and achieved as President. Denying that only reveals your bias.

Barack Obama won the presidency of the United States by promising to end the Iraq War and he did so in his first term. Ending a war is much harder than starting one. And being honest about war is the most difficult task of all.

[CC image by The U.S. Army.]


  • The Other Bob

    Great commentary

  • http://3chicspolitico.com/ Ametia

    KUDOS, EB.  And we’re coming up on the 1 year mark of the take down of Osama Bin Laden.  POTUS is keeping his promises, in his own way and in his own time.

    • http://eclectablog.com Eclectablog

       Thanks, Ametia. This is an LOLGOP piece, btw.

    • Stereochild86

      Who is to say that Osama is even dead. I know I didn’t see a body. If it was such a big deal and a huge breakthrough for the war on terrorism, why wasn’t he shown to the American people? We all saw Saran publicly hanged and was telivised nation wide. I believe it was staged. I could tell you that your cat is dead and hide it in the closet…I don’t think you would believe me until you saw your cat….just doesn’t make sense. You are all naive.

      • Stereochild86

        Sadam * typo

      • slightlymad the III

         Well, if someone told you that they “loved you,” how many ways would you “demand” that they show you?  It’s one thing to need satisfactory information to make a decision, it’s another to be paranoid about anything you personally cannot verify…. makes your life hard, no doubt.

  • http://twitter.com/bazblackadder Barry Evans

    You need to reme

    • Dave

      I am republican, and that being said, one of the things that bothers me most about what Obama has done is his work on the Armenian Genocide. He told Armenians that he would recognize the Genocide once he was in office, and he blew them off. You. Don’t. Do. That. 

      • Churchlady320

        Everyone has blown off the Armenian genocide because Turkey is a critical ally in a fragile Mid East.  It is a fact of life, and if we’d like genocide not to happen again, we need to find ways to do both.

  • http://twitter.com/bazblackadder Barry Evans

    That said, great article.  

    • http://eclectablog.com Eclectablog

      What said? “You need to reme…”???

  • Bond

    What’s your source for the Iraq war timetable being “why he won the nobel peace prize”? I can’t find any quotes from the nobel committee or anything citing that as the primary reason – just vague references to nuclear disarmament and US engagement with the world.

    • Adam

      I would like the answer to this too, as it does seem nuclear disarmament was the main point of the prize being given.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RSLXRYUTH72RSHW7AC7NDDJXK4 billr

    Spot on!  Great writeup.

    Obama/Biden ’12 too!

  • CB_Demented

    Supporting your theory reveals your bias…and your ignorance of military operations in the region.

    But that’s really not important, nor is any of the things you mentioned.

    The most important thing about Obama’s Presidency is what he didn’t do. He, along with a congress that could not be denied by sheer numbers alone, did absolutely nothing it insure that the economic crisis that he inherited, couldn’t happen again.

    The same conditions exist now as they did then. The same lack of regulation exists now as it did then. The same single insurance company carries almost all the paper for all the banks in the US.

    At a time when he had all the votes he needed in congress, and would have had the support of most of the 99%, he chose to ignore the problem so he could pursue other agendas. Rather than protect the economy for 300M people, he wanted to make sure 30M people got insurance.

    • djc84

      The problem is there is no one running who will put more regulations on the industry. Obama and the Democrats are the best chance and its obvious that they wont do it. The GOP will do the opposite and REMOVE as many regulations as they can. Not very good options if you’re a middle class American.

    • Jauchincloss17

      Having insurance ensures that less people are going into debt, which actually improves the economy. He saw a healthcare crisis and made that a priority, and health care is related to our economy. It’s unfair that just because he doesn’t do what one person wants done first he is deemed as ineffective and useless. Also have to remember he has not received the support he needed for every issue he wanted to fix/work on.

    • Bill Cole

      “ when he had all the votes he needed in congress”

      You keep using phrases like that which don’t refer to any time that ever actually existed. 

      A short  Civics lesson and review of recent history:

      1.  The President does not have any control over the Congressional agenda, he doesn’t even have formal input. 
      2. What little power of legislative party discipline exists in our system is entirely held by the party leaders in Congress and their caucus members collectively, and 
      3. The Democrats have a long history of not applying what little discipline they theoretically could apply. 
      4. Dodd-Frank ended up as a relatively weak bill as it took too forever to pass because of *Democrats* (Dodd included)  who opposed stronger reforms.   

      • http://eclectablog.com Eclectablog

        Nailed it. Nice reality check, Bill.

      • Adam

        Not to mention the period of time between Al Franken’s election and swearing in, one of the votes that was supposedly “needed” took at least 6 months to actually appear.  And a number of other obstacles – I can only think of one vote that went straight down party lines of 60-40, and that was the health care law.  I do not recall any other vote, soundly opposed by Republicans, being also soundly supported by the other 60 members of Congress (who were not all Democrats, and CERTAINLY not all liberal).

    • Adam

       Just as I disagree with anyone who says that Obama is terrible somehow and that is why they are voting for the other guy, I also disagree that the importance of a Presidency is what was NOT done.  You need someone to vote FOR, not someone to vote AGAINST.  if all we did was ever measure Presidencies by what was NOT done, every single one of them would be labeled a failure.

      In addition, your comments backing up the importance of inaction statement seem to be a bit odd, considering no other President or Congress would even try to approach what solutions you have in mind.

  • RobM

    The problem w/ the President’s accomplishments is against the background of the Great Recession no one pays attention unless it goes directly to their interest. fr example, the health insurance reform act allows parents whom have health insurance to put their children up to the day the child turns 26 on their health insurance. he number of people is miniscule against the number of people who don’t have healht insurance. the ability to receive health insurance if you have a preexisting condition means you have to have health insurance. worse if you have gone on state disability insurance, you may have to stay in penury even if you can afford to leave it. the part that would be most helpful the insurance pools don’t even go into effect until 2014. so when you go down the list of the President’s accomplishments they do not resonate unless it effects you directly.

    • 848484

      JUST WHAT PART OF TWO TRILLION DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?  DO YOU WANT A WASHINGTON BUREAUCRAT STANDING BETWEEN YOU AND YOUR DOCTOR?  THAT IS IF YOU CAN ACTUALLY FIND A DOCTOR THAT WILL ACCEPT THE GOVERNMENT PAYMENT.

      • RobM

         I understand that you are not thinking clearly. If you use private health care insurance a health insurance company regulator stands between you and your doctor. In a pure capitalistic society you could no longer afford health insurance if you became sick at a cost you could afford nor could you afford to  pay for it yourself if you had for example continuous radiation therapy for stage two liver cancer.
        the question is how to make liberal capitalism work when it comes to health care. given how insurance works and everyone is likely to need health insurance at some time a pure state run policy w/ everyone paying a premium would be best.

  • http://twitter.com/suebarnhart_ Sue Barnhart

    RobM,  but the accomplishment of ObamaCares effects every single working person out there — cause it give us HC coverage should we lose our job.  How come No ONE seems to recognize this major piece of the law???  Jobs no longer last a lifetime like was common in my the working world of parents.  MOst of us will have 15 jobs in our lifes with time between them.  This law puts anyone who is earning under certain salary on Medicaid and provides subsidies to those below even higher salaries.  It is a safety net  for working people we have NEVER had before.  The group of a people who can be unemployed is  a gigantic group.

    • Stereochild86

      Excuse me? I already pay taxes for for the elderly and for those who are either low income or not working. Im not going to pay taxes for your health insurance because you lost your job. I’m not your momma. If you loose your job…that means GO GET ANOTHER ONE. This is not a commune. This is America. We didn’t build this country on communism and socialism. We actually believe it or not established America to liberate ourselves from living like that in the first place…are you ignorant to American history?

      • http://twitter.com/h0lypuma HolyPuma

        So we should be selfish and not help others, even if we have the ability? You sound like a great person….

        • 848484

          YOU’RE CRAZY AS A LOON. JUST WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR OBOZO’S STUPID ACTS?  THE COUNTRY IS GOING BROKE AND YOU AND YOUR PRESIDENT THINK WE CAN JUST GO ON SPENDING MONEY WE HAVE TO BORROW; NOT TO MENTION THAT WE CAN’T REPAY.

          • RobM

            The question of spending money we don’t have is one issue. The psending of money we do have is another. I much rather spend the money we have on healthcare here than on defending countries  capable of it themselves or finding terrorists under the bed(keeping w/ the current meme of updated anti communist rhetoric,so I’d slash the defence budget. I would rewrite the tax code not to be revenue neutral but to bring every dollar of income under it, use it to fund education, infrastructure, social programs and then pay down the debt

          • 848484

            WELL, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A LOT OF SPENDING THERE.  WE’VE SPENT TRILLIONS ON EDUCATION, HOUSING FOR THE POOR, FOOD STAMPS, ETC., AND NONE OF THESE HAVE RESPONDED POSITIVELY.  I REALLY THINK THAT I CAN SPEND WHAT MONEY I HAVE MUCH MORE EFFICIENTLY THAN CAN A BUREAUCRAT IN WASHINGTON.  DEBT IS KILLING US INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A NATION.  WE HAVE TO REDUCE SPENDING TO MATCH THE COUNTRY’S INCOME AND NOT INCREASE INCOME TO MATCH SPENDING.  IN MY OPINION, WE DO NOT NEED MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING.  TO THE SURPRISE OF MANY, THERE IS NO MULTIPLIER EFFECT IN THE PRIVATE FOR MONEY SPENT BY THE GOVERNMENT.  MANY FEEL THAT THE PRIVATE ECONOMY IS REDUCED BY $.50 FOR EVERY DOLLAR SPENT BY OUR WONDERFUL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

          • http://eclectablog.com Eclectablog

            Quit using up all the capital letters, Captain Capslock. You make yourself look as dumb as you sound.

          • 848484

            HEY DUMB A$$, WHEN YOU’RE 72 AND CAN’T SEE OR TYPE WORTH A CRAP, YOU MIGHT CHOOSE TO USE SOMETHING YOU CAN READ AS WELL.

          • RobM

            “MANY FEEL THAT THE PRIVATE ECONOMY IS REDUCED BY $.50 FOR EVERY DOLLAR SPENT BY OUR WONDERFUL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.”
            One, “many feel” is not empirical fact. Two, the real question is what would you spend government money on? I think to cut off social programs means there would be no schools and therefore no upward movement in an education based society for example. Three, government bureaucrats spend money keeping you from buying prescription drugs that could kill you, money on food and product safety to be more exact. Are you suggesting you want to rid yourself these bureaucrats? I doubt it.
            As to spending on the poor you feel is counter productive has it occurred to you that if you provide tax credits and incentives to business to move jobs overseas, we will address the issue of labor mobility and costs later, as an act of government through tax policy there is no place for the poor to go?
            I know from your writing you just have these false resentments because you are managing your life “well”. If you are not prepared to say in totality where you would reduce spending you are simply an angry failure at what you would want. i say angry because you can’t coherently explain what it is you really want other than bureaucrats and spending your dollars better than someone else in government.

          • 848484

            LET ME GUESS.  YOU ARE A RESIDENT OF NY OR CALIFORNIA?

            NO ($.50 DRAIN), IS NOT A FACT.  NEITHER IS THE MULTIPLIER EFFECT.

            I DON’T WANT GOVERNMENT MONEY GOING TO MOTHERS WHO KEEP BIRTHING KIDS ONLY FOR THE INCOME WHICH REPLACES THE MALE IN THE FAMILY UNIT.

            I WANT FOOD STAMPS AND ALL OTHER CRUTCHES TO BE GIVEN TO THOSE WHO ARE DEBILITATED AND NOT ON DRUGS.

            I WANT NO MONEY FOR ILLEGALS.  PERIOD.

            I WANT A REDUCTION TO ALL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT/ DEPARTMENTS.  A 10 TO 15% DECREASE IN BUDGETS WILL NOT NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEIR “EFFICIENCY”…HA! THAT’S A JOKE.

            GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT HAS INCREASED CONSIDERABLY IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS.  WHY?

            WHY IS THE EPA RUNNING A CAP AND TRADE ROUSE WHILE SUBVERTING CONGRESS?

            I WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT OUR BORDERS AND MAINTAIN A STRONG MILITARY, AND YES I WANT FOOD INSPECTED, DRUG APPROVAL, ETC.  I DON’T WANT THEM TELLING ME WHAT I CAN AND CAN’T DO OR THAT I MUST PURCHASE ANY DAMN THING.

            ARE YOU GETTING THE PICTURE I SEE?

          • RobM

            Not at all. what does a strong military need to do? do we need bases in europe where they d not spend the money to protect themselves? there is a logic to a certain number of forward bases to protect your supply train but 75+ is to many. If the Federal government protects your food they are telling you what to do? When it comes to telling you what to purchase if you drive a car the government(states) tell you what you must have to drive. why is having to buy health insurance when you do not recieve it from your employer any different? what you want there is to game the system, i.e. to be able to buy when you need it. that is not the way insurance works. Insurance works on the probablity that you will need something that everyone else needs but you will all not access it at the same time bankrupting the system. it works on the idea for anything that your need will vary at any time, broken arm vs stage two cancer treatment as extremes, so your premium dollars when invested in total w/ everyone else will provide enough money to carry everyone over time.
            As to the state I live in it is PA.
            As to the multiplier effect it does work. As to everyone receiving food stamps like voter fraud in states where tests have been used, FLA, the amount of drug abusers receiving food stamps is miniscule. The number of illegals in this country, and here is suspect you’re racist because I don’t think you would do a damn thing about the Irish in Boston, the amount of money they recieve in benefits vis a vis they amount they contribute through work and is not put into the system by exploitative employers plus the money they do receive exceeds what they take out.
            Carte Blanche reductions in departments is unfeasible because you would not even run your household like that. A reduction of 10% in your pay would not lead to a 10% reduction in food costs nor in gasoline for your car to go to work but you might kill cable premium channels can you certainly can’t cut 10%of your daughter’s ballet lessons.
            Your problem is you are angry about abuses of the system but a draconian cut doesn’t stop the abusers it hurts those who need it.

          • 848484

            I AGREE WITH MUCH OF WHAT YOU SAY. RE INSURANCE…I WANT TO KEEP THE INSURANCE I HAVE.  WITH OBOZOCARE, IT WILL GO AWAY.  YOU ARE RIGHT.  I’M SICK OF WHAT THIS COUNTRY HAS DONE FOR THE BLACKS.  I BLAME THE DEMOCRATS AS I SAID BEFORE. THE MULTIPLIER EFFECT IS YOUR OPINION, I HAVE MINE.  YES, YOU CAN (I CAN) CUT EVERYTHING IN MY HOUSEHOLD BUDGET BY 15% AND DO JUST FINE.  AS MUCH SLACK AS THERE IS IN FED. GOV’T., IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE.  NOPE, WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TROOPS IN EUROPE, AND 75% OF THE OTHER PLACES.

          • RobM

            I suggest you call or look up on your states insurance web site what a minimum health insurance policy covers in your state, what it costs to buy it as an individual and what it costs as part of group insurance through your employer. then check out what it costs in other states. Then check out what the state insurance pools to be set up before 2014 project their costs to be. Being in a larger pool is by definition less expensive than a smaller pool apples to apples.
            As to blacks I am sick of what racism has done as well. Government programs such as redlining, this goes back to the 50′s have been a diasaster for the community. Moving jobs away from the area because of red lining has not helped. The policies that move jobs away from the new areas has not helped anyone in America. I suggest we might find more common ground in changing tax and other economic policies that would allow economic growth than exchanging charges over which party is worse economically let alone on social policy

    • RobM

       Sue
      The parts of healthcare you are referring to, i.e. the state run insurance pools do not kick in until 2014. This is what I mean when I say it does not effect enough people today. You unfortunately are going to have to live till then and assume the American Taliban does not come to power to receive the benefits. So if you make it to 2014 it will be a good thing but it is not now. Because of that the health insurance reform act is similar to people who wish to enter heaven and are Catholics(Protestants and Jews have a different theory). They figure they can pray repent pay indulgences and get in right before they die.
      As you hinted at most people do not have health insurance through their employer. You write as though you have insurance or are young enough you still believe your invincible(do not be upset at that statement I thought so too).

  • Stereochild86

    I would like to announce that you must be an idiot. Just tell me, really, what has Obama done for this country because I don’t see that he has done a single thing good for this country…not one. By the way might I add that this has nothing to do with being a Republican it a Democrat, its about what these people are doing while they are in office. We were already in debt, a lot of that because of the unnecessary war going on in the middle east…and wars the we know nothing of the true nature of why we were actually there. That’s a lot of money wasted. We did nothing over there. It put us in debt an the otherhand we have president Obama elected, who is a socialist progressive. Number one, I don’t approved of any polital person or party who is socialist. Everybody thinks its a game, a free ride, a better America, wrong answer. It just means more taxes. Everybody takes care of everybody is something that doesn’t work and I’ll tell you why…because then that means less people taking care of themselves because they don’t have to. OBAMACARE for instance…another tax taken out of your paycheck. And you think it will alone spgreat, go talk to Canada about universal healthcare and that’s working out for them. Canadians come to the US. For treatment…sure they could get treatment in Canada but they would have to wait at least two years or linger before they can even get treated. I don’t want that. And I think anyone who supports Obama and his socialist/ Communist agenda i rhink you must be anidiot. Just remember, if you have a government that is big enough to give you everything you need, then you have a government who then has power to take it all away, then what are we left with? Then what are you going to do about it? That freedom and liberty will no longer Wake up America. So he gives good speeaches,so did Hitler, what’s your point?

  • Pingback: Are you better off now than you were before the GOP crashed the global economy? | Eclectablog

  • Mrh7775

    848484–the question is not whether we need more gvt spending or not, it’s what should we be spending the money we spend ON? Spending a dollar to save a dime makes no sense, whereas spending a dime to save a dollar does make sense. Obamacare does cost money, but it saves more: prevention of disease is always cheaper than waiting (to save a dime) and then having to treat a health crisis. “Housing for the poor and food stamps” are expensive, but are far less expensive than having to deal with the consequences that would come from letting the poor starve on the streets. And if you think education is expensive, you should try calculating the costs of ignorance. (By the way, much as I know that the human costs are higher and more important than fiscal costs, I am not sure that you know this to be true–so I’m sticking to measley money, here) Meanwhile, the US military budget is higher than all of the entire world’s other countries’ military budgets COMBINED. I say we can trim a fair measure of fat from that slice of the budget without losing anything we cannot live without. If you don’t like what I’ve said so far, you would hate what I’d say about the world  financial policy disaster typically described as “free trade.” Oh, and just to save your supply of capital letters from running low, let me just add this: screw Communism, screw Socialism, and screw Capitalism as well.

    The Beginning is near.

  • Pingback: This President's Greatest Accomplishment | Eclectablog | Universal Health Care Advice

  • Pingback: Hate Guantánamo Bay and drone strikes? Blame the American people, too | Eclectablog

  • CATFACE T-SHIRT

    Um…the unhinged caps-lock ranting part?

  • CATFACE T-SHIRT

    You are the one failing at history here. You claim that America was founded to escape ideologies that didn’t even exist yet. Your comments also reveal that you’re a bitter-hearted turd of a person.

  • CATFACE T-SHIRT

    Aaaaand it all becomes clear: I’M SICK OF WHAT THIS COUNTRY HAS DONE FOR THE BLACKS. Thanks for finally being honest and just pulling your hood on, Buford.

  • CATFACE T-SHIRT

    I’m guessing your family members spend a lot of their time rolling their eyes and deleting emails that start with Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd:

  • 848484

    MAN YOU MUST HAVE A CHARMED LIFE IF ALL YOU ARE WORRYING ABOUT IS SOMEBODY USING ALL CAPS. SUGGEST YOU GET A LIFE…JERK. I USE CAPS BECAUSE I NO LONGER SEE WELL AND DON’T TYPE TOO GOOD BECAUSE OF ARTHRITIS. BY THE WAY, DROP DEAD.

  • 848484

    ARE YOU ON MEDICARE AND HAVE YOU TRIED TO FIND A DOCTOR THAT ACCEPTS MEDICARE PATIENTS? DIDN’T THINK SO.

  • 848484

    HEY DUMB, DUMB I SUGGEST YOU READ THE FOLLOWING: http://townhall.com/columnists/starparker/2009/02 /09/back_on_uncle_sams_plantation/page/full/ HERE’S A SNIPPET OF THE ARTICLE.

    A benevolent Uncle Sam welcomed mostly poor black Americans onto the
    government plantation. Those who accepted the invitation switched
    mindsets from “How do I take care of myself?” to “What do I have to do
    to stay on the plantation?”

    Instead of solving economic problems, government welfare socialism
    created monstrous moral and spiritual problems. The kind of problems
    that are inevitable when individuals turn responsibility for their lives
    over to others. BY THE WAY, STAR PARKER IS BLACK! SHE UNDERSTANDS WHAT YOU AND I WILL NEVER COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND.

  • http://eclectablog.com Eclectablog

    TOP COMMENT!!!

  • 848484

    I DON’T DISAGREE WITH YOUR POST. HOWEVER, IF DOCTORS CHOOSE NOT TO ACCEPT MEDICARE PATIENTS, WHAT GOOD IS OBOZOCARE?

  • http://eclectablog.com Eclectablog

    Stop it with the “Obozocare” bullshit or I will ban you.

    Thanks.

  • 848484

    HELP YOURSELF YOU LIBERAL CREEP. YOU’RE NOT BUYING ME ANY BEER. GET A LIFE.

eXTReMe Tracker