Barack Obama, GOPocrisy — June 12, 2014 at 9:59 am

REMINDER: Tea Partiers still want a default that will destroy the global economy



In the midst of the worst of the Great Recession, before Barack Obama was even sworn in, Eric Cantor was the leader of the movement to do nothing to help the new president fix the disasters he inherited.

During the debt limit crisis of 2011, the author of The New New Deal Mike Grunwald points out, Cantor’s job was to “babysit” John Boehner to keep the Speaker from striking a deal as the world’s markets tumbled.

But that wasn’t extreme enough for this Republican Party.

On Tuesday, Cantor was defeated by Dave Brat, an economics professor who idolizes Ayn Rand. On Wednesday, he revealed that he isn’t sure if there should be any minimum wage. But one thing he’s perfectly clear on is that he will never vote to raise the debt limit.

Brat also attacked the Majority Leader for supporting immigration reform, which Cantor didn’t, and attacked him as a tool of Wall Street. While he was fully invested in economic sabotage, it’s true that Cantor’s double dealing often veered far from true conservatism.

As unnerving it is to see a fellow Jew and the only Jewish Republican in Congress attacked for his ties to “bankers,” Democrats should be reminded that Cantor primarily lost because he’s an unlikable guy who ran a terrible campaign. Still, this loss does show that the GOP base is not done demanding that its leaders do anything possible to destroy Obama’s presidency.

Most alarmingly, Cantor’s loss could have huge ramifications in the near future.

Immigration reform, the heart transplant the GOP needs to reach out to the fastest growing group of voters in America, is still unlikely. It wasn’t likely to pass before and probably still won’t. House Republicans aren’t likely to pass any legislation — except VA reform — that the president wants.

But next March, Congress will have to raise the debt limit again.

Even though the deficit has fallen faster under Obama than at any time in at least 60 years, Republicans will likely use this moment to make more demands knowing that the president has vowed never to negotiate over the credit of the United States again.

This February the House voted to extend the debt limit for just over a year to move the issue out of an election year — but only 28 Republicans voted for the bill. One of them was Eric Cantor.

In 2015, no election looms. Ted Cruz — who is celebrating Cantor’s defeat — will argue that any gains the party made will be because it dared to shut down the government, even though the actual shutdown led the party to the worst poll numbers in history.

Which Republicans will feel safe voting for a clean increase knowing it could cost them their job?

Is the specter of a financial crisis worse than the one Bush left us enough to make the party rational enough to listen to its big funders? Wouldn’t a crisis like that help elect not just a Republican but an extremist like Cruz?

The Republican base seems willing to find out. And when a party is willing to take down its own leaders to make an a barely intelligable point, you have to believe they’re capable of anything. This is something voters need to be reminded of when they get their next chance to stop them in November.

[Photo by Chris Savage | Eclectablog]

  • Riani

    Do you mean “…GOP needs to reach out to the fastest [growing] group of voters in America, is still unlikely.”

    • Yes. Thanks for the edit. I’ve corrected the typo.

    • hora

      Yes, you are right, see 69% opposite all illegals and will grow until November, mean (R) better obey a Law and start deported all, haunt like is criminals, but is not clear for Dems who will loose for illegals. A only way stop illegals are this deported all, close and seal a border, give a jail times who try across,let Border Patrol use a dealy force against illegals and smuggler and sure no more money to Mexico Gov, reduce or stop a commerce, we no need nothing from Mexico and haunting all drug deales and give dead sentences. Duplicate or triplicate a number of border agent, stop enter any truck commercial from Mexico, but simple send a Army to a Border.But are another areas need GOP attack,homosexuals,union labor, business who employ illegals, or business bring Mexican product to sell here, show Mexican Gov and a rest of Country a game are over, start fix you economy and create job, but not send to North.

  • judyms9

    There seems to be a rabid nihilism going on at the outer fringes of the GOP. They seem to think a nation of 330 million people of diverse colors, religions, skills, and cultures can be governed by the Military Industrial Complex and a couple of governors and funded by hat-passing. Randian economics espoused by Brat work in the drug world and in international gun running, but would not work in a nation that believes in consumer protections. Let’s hope he’s beaten by Dem Trammel in the general election. And he could be.

  • Mike R

    It would take a lot for a “default”. A lot could be cut to avoid that.

    Of course Obama as a Senator also voted to not raise the debt ceiling but I don’t recall anyone on here criticizing Obama in a similar fashion.

    • proterozoic

      Correct, because it was a symbolic vote and there was never any threat of actual default.

      • Mike R

        So when it doesn’t “count” you can vote recklessly.

        • proterozoic

          When it doesn’t count, then it’s not a reckless vote.

          • Andrew Patton

            So hypocrisy is okay, but actually voting your convictions is not. Got it.

          • proterozoic

            Voting your convictions is hugely not okay, when your convictions include triggering national default as some kind of cleansing experience.

          • Andrew Patton

            Then by your own standards, you must condemn President Obama for voting for default to make himself look better.

          • proterozoic

            No, because triggering default isn’t Obama’s conviction.

          • Andrew Patton

            Exactly, he’s a hypocrite because he voted contrary to his conviction in order to make himself look better.

  • Pingback: This week in progressive state blogs: Jindal helps oil pals, Wehby could learn from Dr. Seuss — LiberalVoiceLiberalVoice — Your source for everything about liberals and progressives! — News and tweets about everything liberals and progre()

  • Pingback: This week in progressive state blogs: Jindal helps oil pals, Wehby could learn from Dr. Seuss - Political Truths()

  • Pingback: This week in progressive state blogs: Jindal helps oil pals, Wehby could learn from Dr. Seuss - Online Political Blog()