Why Republicans Suck at Twitter Parody

Or “50 Teleprompter Jokes to Amuse Your Boss”

A few days ago the Romney campaign created a parody Twitter to mock Bill Clinton’s supposed gaffes. And, of course, it was sad.

This made me think: Why are there no viral right-wing parody or satire accounts on Twitter? Of course there is @MichelleMalkin. But she’s actually Michelle Malkin.

When Mashable put together its list of top 10 Hysterical Political Parodies on Twitter, the only parody of a Democrat on the list was of irascible Rahm Emmanuel—and I’m sure that was created by a liberal. The rest of the objects of ridicule on that list—which featured the dearly departed @GingrichIdeas—were all Republicans, monarchs or dictators.

Parody is tough. But how about just funny conservatives on Twitter? Why is there no right wing @BorowitzReport, @PourMeCoffee, @AnaMarieCox, @JohnFugelsang or @LizzWinstead? The closest you get is @DaveWeigel and he’s a libertarian.

If @RobDelaney mentions @MittRomney it’s almost always one of the top RTed @MittRomney mentions of the day.

Hell, @LOLGOP is only 29,435 followers behind the actual @GOP.

Why are conservatives hilarious until the exact moment they attempt to be funny?

There’s Mitt Romney telling a hilarious story about workers being laid off. There’s George W. Bush looking for weapons of mass destruction. There’s Donald Trump doing his impression of a racist Andy Kaufman.

Hilarious.

There are two inviolable rules of comedy, as taught to me by the adults I grew up with:

  1. Using any object that is NOT underarm deodorant as underarm deodorant is always funny.
  2. It’s easier to make fun of the boss than the servants.

Republicans are the boss. They’re your father’s Duesenberg. They’re the Duke brothers making one-dollar bets that toy with your fate.

Every day Republicans get on high horses to tell gay people they can’t get married—even though most of them are divorced themselves. They say women shouldn’t make private decisions about when to have a family—though nearly all of them use birth control and would most likely get their daughter an abortion if deemed necessary.

Republicans honestly believe that the solution to every problem is to give rich people more disposable income and Wall Street more freedom—even after that cost us millions and millions of jobs. And this is when they’re not trying to be funny.

Whenever you decide you should be in charge of other people’s lives, you’re ripe for ridicule. When you’re making fun of people on food stamps—people who are more likely to be on food stamps because of your policies—you may be aiming for funny but hitting dicky.

Good jokes bring people together. Bad jokes get a few people laughing at a few people in a way that’s designed to humiliate.

And the top conservatives on Twitter constantly put on a show of their mean-spirited not-funniness over and over by hijacking hashtags and making jokes about eating dog. Hilarious to the perpetrators, no doubt. But so is holding down a kid and cutting his hair.

So how do you do a funny Bill Clinton parody account on Twitter? Don’t even try.

It’s done: @PimpBillClinton.

The Pimp is a fun, good-natured take on the public perception of Bubba’s private life. It’s got nuance and ridiculousness. It simultaneously makes fun of you and Bill Clinton and Bill Clinton’s critics with lusty ease over and over again.

Now, I’m not trying to teach the GOP how to be funny on purpose.

If you give a Republican a fish, he’ll think he learned how to fish. If you teach a Republican to fish, he’ll call you a “socialist.” I’m just pointing that Republicans generally suck at being funny on Twitter. (If you don’t believe me, follow @iowahawkblog now—his batting average on a good day is in the .100s) And all the anonymous corporate money in the world won’t change that.

(Yes, I called you out and I will certainly earn a few “You SUCX!” in return. I can take it. But if I’m wrong, prove it. Give me examples of actual conservative humor that aren’t Dennis Miller pre-9/11. 98% of climate scientists say it just doesn’t exist.)


  • http://twitter.com/DrLearnALot DrLearnALot

    I have been writing about this in my little academic way…that is, comedy and democracy. You hit the nail on the head with your rule #2, the cardinal rule. Elites making fun of non-elites can never be funny, because in a democracy it is always interpreted as bully behavior. My argument is that you can’t have democracy unless the general population has this weapon to wield against the powerful. Great post.

    • http://twitter.com/LOLGOP LOLGOP

      Excellent. I agree completely about the importance of comedy and specifically the Correspondent’s Dinner. a) the President is forced to sit and face a comedian and b) the President gets to demonstrate a taste of his/her humor. Good for democracy all the way around.

      • http://twitter.com/Satur9 SaturNine

        And the President at the WHCD is the HARDEST gig in comedy, anywhere. The reason is exactly what you and Jeanine said – the cardinal rules of comedy and politics are the same. You can punch up, but you CANNOT punch down. Punching down is bullying, and it’s strictly for dicks.

  • Clancy

    I actually stopped following someone on Twitter because they RT’d @iowahawkblog five to ten times per day. Glad to discover I wasn’t alone in finding it completely humorless.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZI6DF64RQDC5M73FG3D3UCRYQU A

    Tons of fake Elizabeth Warren accounts coming out everyday on #mapoli. They pretty much just RT the stupid shit they say from their other accounts. They arent using the accounts for clever satire or anything they use them to twitter bomb certain hashtags until it makes them think they “won”… You see people are always wrong on the internet and the only way to win is to RT your other account a million times. It’s pretty standard shit, that Twitter does an awful job monitoring.

  • Kalamazooey

    The reality for me is that the GOP seems to attract people who were never cool in school or anyplace else. They could never unwind enough to have fun. They didn’t seem to “get it”. They are ideologues who prefer strict rules, black and white divisions, little boxes to fit everyone in. They seem to have an innate lack of empathy which results in that deer-in-the-headlights glaze of “I’ve got mine – what’s wrong with you?” when confronted by poverty/mental illness/bad luck or situations requiring multiple shades of gray. They are the Frank Burnses to the Hawkeyes, the Niedermeyer Romneys to the Delta Housemen, the Billy Grahams to the Joseph Campbells, the Sean Hannitys to the Jon Stewarts. This is why Colbert is funny.

    Don’t get me wrong, a balance is always needed. Too much Left and you have satyriatic excess and endless revolution; too much Right and you have a boring police state. However I also know which side I want to party with.

    • lea

      Actually you’re really not cool right now.

eXTReMe Tracker